Chatbox
Latest topics
» The AFK threadby Tecuani Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:15 am
» Basic - Camouflage and spotting - 26th of November - 19:30UTC
by ZerONRNS Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:42 am
» SGTA is moving!
by Vallu01 Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:57 am
» Trying to understand the T-34...
by Vallu01 Sun Nov 24, 2013 3:53 am
» Hello from Prometheus
by Pendergast Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:15 am
» Repeat of peek-a-boo lesson?
by JosefSvejk Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:57 pm
» M46 Patton, wat to do .vs TD division
by Rajahz Sat Nov 23, 2013 9:46 am
» T-44 Patrol Duty
by Wen90 Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:45 am
» Peek a boo lesson
by Madhias Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:51 am
8.8 Matchmaking System
+4
BadGene616
Wen90
Vallu01
Ding760
8 posters
SGTA :: Barracks :: General Discussion
Page 1 of 1
Ding760- Posts : 1179
Reputation : 99
Join date : 2013-02-07
Location : The People's Republic of China!
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
I didn't know that 112 and T-34-3 get special matchmaking. I'm tempted to buy a 112 now...
And for some reason it's colour coded as a medium?
And for some reason it's colour coded as a medium?
Vallu01- ADMIN
- Posts : 950
Reputation : 73
Join date : 2013-02-06
Location : The Cold North
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
I think the 112 matchmaking is flawed...considering it's a tier 10 heavy which has a maximum matchmaking tier of 9 LOL.
Ding760- Posts : 1179
Reputation : 99
Join date : 2013-02-07
Location : The People's Republic of China!
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
112 is a t8 premium heavy. 113 is a t10 heavy.Ding760 wrote:I think the 112 matchmaking is flawed...considering it's a tier 10 heavy which has a maximum matchmaking tier of 9 LOL.
Learn your Chinese tanks Ding!
Vallu01- ADMIN
- Posts : 950
Reputation : 73
Join date : 2013-02-06
Location : The Cold North
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
Gah! D: You're right! D:
Q.Q
Q.Q
Ding760- Posts : 1179
Reputation : 99
Join date : 2013-02-07
Location : The People's Republic of China!
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
I am skeptical about the 112 being given preferential matchmaking, but time will tell.
Wen90- Posts : 56
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-02-16
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
Apologies for the down vote - clicked the wrong thing!
The new chinese medium has been flagged as a new Type 59 - any thoughts on this?
The new chinese medium has been flagged as a new Type 59 - any thoughts on this?
BadGene616- Posts : 49
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2013-02-08
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
I would describe it as an overall better IS-6.
nilzatron- Guide
- Posts : 276
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2013-06-01
Age : 49
Location : Lands of Nether
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
Nothing like the Type. Well a little bit, maybe. Different armour (bit worse), less gun depression, much more alpha and aim time, worse accuracy, less rof, less pen. Only mobility is about the same. I prefer the Type to be honest.BadGene616 wrote:Apologies for the down vote - clicked the wrong thing!
The new chinese medium has been flagged as a new Type 59 - any thoughts on this?
Vallu01- ADMIN
- Posts : 950
Reputation : 73
Join date : 2013-02-06
Location : The Cold North
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
What is this 11th and 12th battle tier?
Opa_Apo- Posts : 63
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2013-05-24
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
11 and 12 is only to balance the tier 9 and 10 tanks (and high tier scouts) for the matchmaking system as far as I've read some where.
But somebody correct me if I am wrong.
Greets
Ronin
But somebody correct me if I am wrong.
Greets
Ronin
RoninRage- Guide
- Posts : 348
Reputation : 22
Join date : 2013-04-04
Age : 42
Location : Austria
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
Tier 11 and 12 are simply there to complete the highest tier's "difficulty". The basic tier spread is -2 to +2. However, there's no +2 for 10, as its the highest tier. If they wouldn't have tiers 11 and 12, a tier 10 would face (assuming full random spread):
33% Tier 8's, 33% tier 9's, 33% tier 10's. That is very nice for the tier 10's, but not very fair to the tier 8's. Because the tier 8 has a spread from tier 6 to 10 (-2 to +2). That should roughly equal to:
20% tier 6's, 20% tier 7's, 20% tier 8's, 20% tier 9's, 20% tier 10's. But... we just said 33% tier 10's, if the tier 10's didn't have an 11th and 12th battletier! So a tier 8 would get:
17% tier 6's, 17% tier 7's, 17% tier 8's, 17% tier 9's, 33% tier 10's.... would you like to be a tier 8 then?
So, tiers 11 and 12 are to spread out the tier 10's over a higher amount of battles with more tier 10's and 9's
33% Tier 8's, 33% tier 9's, 33% tier 10's. That is very nice for the tier 10's, but not very fair to the tier 8's. Because the tier 8 has a spread from tier 6 to 10 (-2 to +2). That should roughly equal to:
20% tier 6's, 20% tier 7's, 20% tier 8's, 20% tier 9's, 20% tier 10's. But... we just said 33% tier 10's, if the tier 10's didn't have an 11th and 12th battletier! So a tier 8 would get:
17% tier 6's, 17% tier 7's, 17% tier 8's, 17% tier 9's, 33% tier 10's.... would you like to be a tier 8 then?
So, tiers 11 and 12 are to spread out the tier 10's over a higher amount of battles with more tier 10's and 9's
IronClaw- Lead Guide
- Posts : 202
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2013-04-17
Location : The Netherlands
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
BasicallyOpa_Apo wrote:What is this 11th and 12th battle tier?
10=t8-10 tanks in battle
11=t9-10 tanks in battle
12=t10 tanks in battle
Vallu01- ADMIN
- Posts : 950
Reputation : 73
Join date : 2013-02-06
Location : The Cold North
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
No problemBadGene616 wrote:Apologies for the down vote - clicked the wrong thing!
The new chinese medium has been flagged as a new Type 59 - any thoughts on this?
It could go either ways. They are currently weighing the financial potential of 3 options. Although the repeat of the Type 59 is unlikely, it will possibly be something akin to a rota of availability.
Ding760- Posts : 1179
Reputation : 99
Join date : 2013-02-07
Location : The People's Republic of China!
Re: 8.8 Matchmaking System
Thank you for the explaination
Opa_Apo- Posts : 63
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2013-05-24
SGTA :: Barracks :: General Discussion
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|